Squealing like a squealy thing

Don't bite me! You're 'The Taming of the Shrew!'


Which famous Shakespeare play are you?
brought to you by Quizilla

I've never been big on Shakespeare, mainly because it was always forced on me in a very dry way. But "Taming of the Shrew" was one of those that I got the opportunity to really get into. We got to act it out, we got to watch Burton and Taylor in their passionate, fiery glory. This is the Shakespeare that I can *still* quote to this day.

Yo, yo, yo!

(You know, "yo" is hard to type when you're used to typing "you". I'm so not hip.)

Pimp Masta' M here, pimpin' out the fantabulous Level Three Con. You know you wanna. You know you do. *pokes everyone on friends list* Read this site. Join the Yahoo group.

Why go?

Santa Monica. Whacked ass Smallville fans. Karaoke. Smallville discussion. Putting faces to psuedonyms. It's all good!

Gotta love it when justice gets cheeky.

Thank you Detroit for giving us such entertainment.

From the Detroit Free Press:

Rap ruling in Eminem's favor

When giving her ruling as to whether Eminem slandered Deangelo Bailey in his song "Brain Damage", the judge decided it fitting that it be in rap form.

Excerpts from Macomb County Circuit Judge Deborah Servitto's rap in Deangelo Bailey v. Marshall Mathers III (Eminem's birth name):

Mr. Bailey complains that his rep is trash
So he's seeking compensation in the form of cash.
Bailey thinks he's entitled to some monetary gain
Because Eminem used his name in vain.
Eminem says Bailey used to throw him around
Beat him up in the john, shoved his face in the ground.
Eminem contends that his rap is protected
By the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Eminem maintains that the story is true
And that Bailey beat him black and blue.
In the alternative he states that the story is phony
And a reasonable person would think it's baloney.
The court must always balance the rights
Of a defendant and one placed in a false light.
If the plaintiff presents no question of fact
To dismiss is the only acceptable act.
If the language used is anything but pleasin'
It must be highly objectionable to a person of reason.
Even if objectionable and causing offense
Self-help is the first line of defense.
Yet when Bailey actually spoke to the press
what do you think he didn't address?
Those false-light charges that so disturbed
Prompted from Bailey not a single word.
So highly objectionable, it could not be
-- Bailey was happy to hear his name on a CD.
Bailey also admitted he was a bully in youth
Which makes what Marshall said substantial truth.
This doctrine is a defense well known
And renders Bailey's case substantially blown.
The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact
They're an exaggeration of a childish act.
Any reasonable person could clearly see
That the lyrics could only be hyperbole.
It is therefore this court's ultimate position
That Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.